<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Practical Problem with Vocabulary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://languagegeek.net/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/</link>
	<description>Just blogging about my language geekery.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://languagegeek.system13.org/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>languagelearner: Nope, no article on that yet, but that's a good idea. :) I think many people prefer flashcards because they're small enough that you can literally flip them over to test yourself. With a sheet of paper with a long list of words, it's a bit more difficult to do; you have to cover up all the words, etc. Also, when you uncover one word, you generally uncover ALL the meanings, and your eyes will invariably fall on those meanings. When you get to the words further down the list when testing yourself, do you REALLY know the word meanings, or do you know it simply because you read it just a moment ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>languagelearner: Nope, no article on that yet, but that&#8217;s a good idea. <img src='http://languagegeek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I think many people prefer flashcards because they&#8217;re small enough that you can literally flip them over to test yourself. With a sheet of paper with a long list of words, it&#8217;s a bit more difficult to do; you have to cover up all the words, etc. Also, when you uncover one word, you generally uncover ALL the meanings, and your eyes will invariably fall on those meanings. When you get to the words further down the list when testing yourself, do you REALLY know the word meanings, or do you know it simply because you read it just a moment ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: languagelearner</title>
		<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>languagelearner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://languagegeek.system13.org/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Geoff is right ,you can't copy the dictionary if you want to learn something.Most of the meanings of a word like Vertretung ,you won't find so frequently, I suggest selecting the words  you think you will.
The one thing that still troubles me is why everyone seems to resort to flashcards ,why are they any better than writing the words on a piece of paper.

I mean with my care ,they would easily get lost ,or dog-eared(I wanted to say muzzled hehe )
In my opinion it's cool to see a precedence in your words ,their chronology.
Do you have enough space to write sentences to reflect the word better  on flashcards?
Maybe you already did an article about this ,so I'll go find it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff is right ,you can&#8217;t copy the dictionary if you want to learn something.Most of the meanings of a word like Vertretung ,you won&#8217;t find so frequently, I suggest selecting the words  you think you will.<br />
The one thing that still troubles me is why everyone seems to resort to flashcards ,why are they any better than writing the words on a piece of paper.</p>
<p>I mean with my care ,they would easily get lost ,or dog-eared(I wanted to say muzzled hehe )<br />
In my opinion it&#8217;s cool to see a precedence in your words ,their chronology.<br />
Do you have enough space to write sentences to reflect the word better  on flashcards?<br />
Maybe you already did an article about this ,so I&#8217;ll go find it <img src='http://languagegeek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://languagegeek.system13.org/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Geoff. I think you're right. For a while now, I've been trying to put half a dozen various meanings on one card. I've found that it just doesn't work for me. I'm going to follow your advice and make separate cards for each various meaning of the word, and generally only make cards for the meanings I'm going to be using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Geoff. I think you&#8217;re right. For a while now, I&#8217;ve been trying to put half a dozen various meanings on one card. I&#8217;ve found that it just doesn&#8217;t work for me. I&#8217;m going to follow your advice and make separate cards for each various meaning of the word, and generally only make cards for the meanings I&#8217;m going to be using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://languagegeek.system13.org/2007/01/15/a-practical-problem-with-vocabulary/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>I, too, am very bad about sticking to using my flashcards. Which means that when I do make them, I have to learn with them quickly. That means the association has to be made well and quickly.

I find flashcards are good for reinforcing what you've learned but could forget any day now. They're not so good for learning items at random. So use the flashcard to remind yourself not of mere words, but of what you can do with them. If you're getting your words as you read, include the sentence you came across them in and use that meaning - and only that meaning. If you're learning a wordlist, create sentences of your own, however simple, that show the word used in the situation you'd want to use it in. Again, stick with the meaning you need for that purpose.

There are some people who can learn all ten meanings on the back of that flashcard, and bully for them. But most don't, which is why serious language learners always wind up making their own flashcards instead of using the comprehensive, all-inclusive ready-made sets.

Using handmade flashcards, you can both document and reinforce the stock of vocabulary you are learning by virtue of your contact with the language. Too much info on the cards and you're just documenting your ability to copy from a dictionary. And setting yourself up for frustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, am very bad about sticking to using my flashcards. Which means that when I do make them, I have to learn with them quickly. That means the association has to be made well and quickly.</p>
<p>I find flashcards are good for reinforcing what you&#8217;ve learned but could forget any day now. They&#8217;re not so good for learning items at random. So use the flashcard to remind yourself not of mere words, but of what you can do with them. If you&#8217;re getting your words as you read, include the sentence you came across them in and use that meaning - and only that meaning. If you&#8217;re learning a wordlist, create sentences of your own, however simple, that show the word used in the situation you&#8217;d want to use it in. Again, stick with the meaning you need for that purpose.</p>
<p>There are some people who can learn all ten meanings on the back of that flashcard, and bully for them. But most don&#8217;t, which is why serious language learners always wind up making their own flashcards instead of using the comprehensive, all-inclusive ready-made sets.</p>
<p>Using handmade flashcards, you can both document and reinforce the stock of vocabulary you are learning by virtue of your contact with the language. Too much info on the cards and you&#8217;re just documenting your ability to copy from a dictionary. And setting yourself up for frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
