<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still here! (And a bit about &#8220;Old English&#8221;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://languagegeek.net/2007/10/18/still-here-and-a-bit-about-old-english/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/10/18/still-here-and-a-bit-about-old-english/</link>
	<description>Just blogging about my language geekery.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/10/18/still-here-and-a-bit-about-old-english/#comment-7027</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://languagegeek.net/2007/10/18/still-here-and-a-bit-about-old-english/#comment-7027</guid>
		<description>Yeah, a lot of that does look familiar. I've not looked a great deal at modern Dutch, but from what I have seen, it looks (to my eyes, of course) like someone took German, and shuffled the letters around a bit. It's pretty cool how much of written Dutch I can understand, considering I've never looked at a single lesson on the language. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a lot of that does look familiar. I&#8217;ve not looked a great deal at modern Dutch, but from what I have seen, it looks (to my eyes, of course) like someone took German, and shuffled the letters around a bit. It&#8217;s pretty cool how much of written Dutch I can understand, considering I&#8217;ve never looked at a single lesson on the language. <img src='http://languagegeek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nils</title>
		<link>http://languagegeek.net/2007/10/18/still-here-and-a-bit-about-old-english/#comment-5164</link>
		<dc:creator>Nils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://languagegeek.net/2007/10/18/still-here-and-a-bit-about-old-english/#comment-5164</guid>
		<description>Heh, yeah it's the same here; with (Old) English (perhaps to be expected) as well as with Middle Dutch and the various variations of Old Dutch - which is often some form of Old West Low Franconian ;-)

A nice example of this, btw, are the (beatiful) &lt;a href="http://www.ned.univie.ac.at/publicaties/taalgeschiedenis/en/anltexte.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wachtendonck Psalms&lt;/a&gt;

Head for the bit that starts &lt;em&gt;Forchta in biuonga quamon ouer mi&lt;/em&gt;. With English and German, I'm sure a lot will look familiar.

There's no Es appended, though :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, yeah it&#8217;s the same here; with (Old) English (perhaps to be expected) as well as with Middle Dutch and the various variations of Old Dutch - which is often some form of Old West Low Franconian <img src='http://languagegeek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>A nice example of this, btw, are the (beatiful) <a href="http://www.ned.univie.ac.at/publicaties/taalgeschiedenis/en/anltexte.htm" rel="nofollow">Wachtendonck Psalms</a></p>
<p>Head for the bit that starts <em>Forchta in biuonga quamon ouer mi</em>. With English and German, I&#8217;m sure a lot will look familiar.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no Es appended, though <img src='http://languagegeek.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
